<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Promise of Going &#8216;Lean&#8217;: Increasing Government&#8217;s Capacity to Do More Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kenmillerblog.info/2009/06/lean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kenmillerblog.info/2009/06/lean/</link>
	<description>A blog for change agents by Ken Miller</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:24:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Flinchbaugh</title>
		<link>http://kenmillerblog.info/2009/06/lean/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Flinchbaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenmillerblog.info/?p=198#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Great post Ken. I shared it with my twitter network (@flinchbaugh) and already had some response to reading it. 

On your barriers, I believe #1 and #3 are also barriers in the rest of the lean world. Jargon is useful when a community is so much on the same page that they can use shorthand to communicate. But if you are trying to drive change, jargon is almost always a barrier. 

And I think the focus of lean never should have been on waste elimination. Is that important? Yes. Is it the whole ball of wax? No. First we should think about providing value before thinking about eliminating waste. 

Thanks, 

Jamie Flinchbaugh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Ken. I shared it with my twitter network (@flinchbaugh) and already had some response to reading it. </p>
<p>On your barriers, I believe #1 and #3 are also barriers in the rest of the lean world. Jargon is useful when a community is so much on the same page that they can use shorthand to communicate. But if you are trying to drive change, jargon is almost always a barrier. </p>
<p>And I think the focus of lean never should have been on waste elimination. Is that important? Yes. Is it the whole ball of wax? No. First we should think about providing value before thinking about eliminating waste. </p>
<p>Thanks, </p>
<p>Jamie Flinchbaugh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Robinson</title>
		<link>http://kenmillerblog.info/2009/06/lean/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenmillerblog.info/?p=198#comment-11</guid>
		<description>My experience in consulting to government with intense 5-day &quot;rapid process improvement&quot; workshops is that this kind of quick but deep work reaps all kinds of rewards.  Most of all, as you suggest, rapid improvement reduces the extra work on people&#039;s plates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience in consulting to government with intense 5-day &#8220;rapid process improvement&#8221; workshops is that this kind of quick but deep work reaps all kinds of rewards.  Most of all, as you suggest, rapid improvement reduces the extra work on people&#8217;s plates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BryanB</title>
		<link>http://kenmillerblog.info/2009/06/lean/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>BryanB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenmillerblog.info/?p=198#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Amen, great way of looking at things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, great way of looking at things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

